Insights from past enforcement actions by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) offer valuable lessons for reducing risk and safeguarding patient data.
OCR resolves most cases informally through voluntary compliance, corrective actions, or resolution agreements, which often include monetary settlements. However, when informal resolution isn’t possible, OCR may impose civil money penalties.
Recent enforcement trends indicate that HIPAA compliance remains a high priority, even during challenging periods such as the pandemic. These cases show the necessity of proactively managing risk to avoid financial penalties and reputational damage.
In the news: Lessons learned from OCR’s first HIPAA enforcement action of 2025
OCR investigations frequently reveal that covered entities failed to perform risk assessments. HIPAA's security rule requires entities to evaluate potential threats and vulnerabilities and implement tailored policies and procedures to mitigate risks.
Notable cases:
Action steps:
Encryption provides a safe harbor under HIPAA, protecting data from unauthorized access in case of loss or theft. Despite its importance, unencrypted devices remain a common vulnerability in many breach cases.
Notable cases:
Action steps:
HIPAA requires covered entities to establish a BAA before sharing PHI with a third party. Without this agreement, disclosures of PHI are considered impermissible and subject to enforcement action.
Notable cases:
Action steps:
Covered entities are responsible for ensuring employees follow HIPAA policies and procedures. Many enforcement actions stem from employee errors or unauthorized access to PHI.
Notable cases:
Action steps:
HIPAA compliance isn’t static—it requires continuous evaluation and updates to policies, procedures, and technologies. Outdated practices can lead to vulnerabilities and enforcement actions.
Notable cases:
Action steps:
HIPAA enforcement actions show the serious consequences of non-compliance for healthcare organizations of all sizes. Learning from these cases and implementing proactive measures helps covered entities better protect sensitive health information, minimize legal risks, and maintain patient trust.
If an organization disputes the OCR’s findings, it can request a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) to challenge the proposed penalties. However, most cases don’t reach this stage, as organizations often opt for a resolution agreement to avoid prolonged legal battles and additional costs.
Yes, smaller providers are just as likely to face enforcement actions. The OCR does not limit investigations to large healthcare systems. In fact, smaller organizations often face penalties for neglecting basic HIPAA requirements, like risk assessments and business associate agreements, which apply to all covered entities regardless of size.
Yes. HIPAA penalties can be imposed even if no breach occurs. The OCR often enforces penalties for non-compliance with administrative safeguards, such as missing risk assessments, outdated policies, or lack of BAAs. Compliance is required even when there’s no evidence of data exposure.
Yes, HIPAA enforcement evolves to address new risks from emerging technologies. For example, OCR has issued guidance on the use of mobile devices, cloud storage, and telehealth services. Healthcare organizations must evaluate whether new technologies introduce vulnerabilities and update their compliance measures accordingly.
Organizations can reduce the risk of repeat violations by implementing post-settlement compliance plans, including regular third-party audits, employee retraining programs, and ongoing risk assessments. Monitoring compliance improvements through internal audits also helps demonstrate a proactive approach to safeguarding PHI.