Anonymization is the process of removing identifying information, making re-identification impossible. De-identification, however, can allow re-identification if certain controls are in place. Under HIPAA, both anonymization and de-identification are acceptable for research or other scientific purposes.
Anonymization is the process of removing all personally identifiable information (PII) from a dataset. Anonymization ensures that the individuals to whom the data originally pertained cannot be re-identified, even with advanced techniques or additional data. In other words, anonymization is designed to make the data truly anonymous.
Consider a dataset containing patient information from a hospital. If this data is anonymized, all information that could identify a specific patient—such as name, date of birth, medical record number, or specific treatment details—would be removed or altered so that re-identification is impossible.
See also: HIPAA Compliant Email: The Definitive Guide
De-identification involves modifying personal data so that the individuals in the dataset are not readily identifiable. Unlike anonymization, de-identification does not guarantee that re-identification is impossible. Instead, it reduces the risk of re-identification to an acceptable level, often through techniques such as data masking, pseudonymization, or data aggregation.
According to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HIPAA’s Privacy Rule allows covered entities or business associates to create non-identifiable information by following the de-identification standard and implementation specifications.
If the same hospital dataset is de-identified, patient names and medical record numbers might be replaced with pseudonyms, and specific treatment dates might be generalized to a broader time range. While the data is less identifiable, someone with access to additional information or sophisticated techniques might still be able to re-identify individual patients.
Related: How to de-identify protected health information for privacy
The distinction between anonymization and de-identification is not just academic; it has practical implications for data privacy and security. Anonymized data, due to its irreversible nature, can often be used more freely, as it poses little risk to individual privacy. However, because it retains some level of identifiability, de-identified data must be handled with more caution and may still be subject to privacy regulations.
Organizations must carefully choose between anonymization and de-identification based on their specific needs and the level of privacy protection required. In cases where the goal is to maximize data utility while minimizing risk de-identification is the preferred choice. In other cases, where the highest level of privacy protection is necessary, anonymization may be the only acceptable option.
Challenges in achieving true anonymization include:
Anonymization and de-identification can be applied to many types of data, including structured data (like databases) and unstructured data (like text documents). However, the effectiveness of these processes depends on the nature of the data. For instance, anonymizing free text data or images can be more challenging due to the complexity of identifying and removing all potential identifiers.