The key distinction between electronic health records (EHR) and personal health records (PHR) lies in ownership and control. EHRs are managed by healthcare providers and organizations, aiming to facilitate communication and continuity of care among healthcare professionals. PHRs, however, put the patient in control, allowing them to manage and access their health information, potentially improving their engagement in their care.
An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital storage of a patient's comprehensive medical history, collated and managed by authorized healthcare providers and facilities. It encompasses a wealth of data, including diagnoses, treatment plans, medications, laboratory test results, immunization records, allergies, and more.
The primary goal of an EHR is to streamline the sharing of critical health information among healthcare professionals involved in a patient's care.
Conversely, a personal health record (PHR) is an individual's repository of health-related data, managed and controlled by the patient. This record includes personal medical history, medication details, allergies, immunizations, and possibly lifestyle information. Unlike an EHR managed by healthcare providers, a PHR is managed by the patient.
Related: What standards apply to personal health records (PHR)?
While EHRs streamline communication and coordination among healthcare providers, PHRs empower individuals to become active participants in their healthcare journey.
The integration of EHRs and PHRs holds immense promise for revolutionizing patient care. By integrating these records, patients can contribute additional valuable data, while healthcare providers gain access to a more comprehensive and detailed overview of a patient's health, thereby fostering personalized and more effective treatments.
Related: